For a long time, Jacob Lief believed that his philanthropic efforts were improving lives of the impoverished. However, little did he know that the money did not impact the targeted population. For this reason, he imposed stringent measures on donors, specifically those who had premeditated how they spend the grants. He instead prioritized coming up with best methods of satisfying the intended targets, destitute children.
As a result of this measure, the Ubuntu Educational Fund spends a lesser budget with better achievements. A new model dubbed the ‘Ubuntu Model’ has been embraced, in which personalized plans are established for each unique child, a move that has increased the efficacy of the fund. The charity engages in humanitarian acts in South Africa.
Donors often give money with some necessary conditions; hence Jacob Lief’s case is peculiar. Some givers specify how they want their money to be spent while other want to be part and parcel of the fund’s management. While these affiliations may have positive influences, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Donors usually interfere with the operations of the charitable organizations, especially when incorporated to their executive boards, as they want to champion to their personal interests.
To avoid these inconsistencies, it is recommended that both parties meet upfront to iron out any differences. This will, in turn, result in smooth management if the funds and their intended purposes. Also, it will avert the high-profile negative headlines often associated with such fallouts.
About Andrew Rolfe
Andrew Rolfe is the current chairman of the Ubuntu Educational Fund, a position he has held for over a decade. In this role, Andrew Rolfe supervises the provision of basic needs and social amenities to poor kids living in the suburbs of Port Elizabeth in South Africa.
Under the exemplary leadership of Andrew Rolfe, Ubuntu has made significant leaps towards achieving its ultimate goal, which is to eradicate poverty by educating underprivileged children.